They compete by having a price point much much lower than a gaming PC...and for a good chunk of people that lower price point still gives them alot of game to play.
have internet (because if they did they would just get prompted and hit OK) please tell me something....how would they know they want/need a firmware update in the first place?
I said nothing of the sort. LTR. Show me where I said I'm disagreeing because it 'ain't pro ps3'? I didn't.
when your f'cking name is a tribute to a certain console. BS much?
xboxOZ360 (not really reading anything he has to say) is I hate douches that write and tip their own article AND come onto N4G to defend it.
Dude...if you want to run a website...defend your article THERE.
This isn't a 'fanboy' statement...its a keep crap off of N4G statement.
in China.
Also more than 50% of its outstanding shares are owned outside of Japan.
Its Chairman/CEO and President is a Welsh born American businessman.
Yep...they sure are xenophobic.
The more you know.
...
The data throughput of a 2x BD disc on the PS3 is equivelent to the DVD9 in an Xbox.
This has zero to do with the PS3 being slow...it has to do with devs who don't laydown the data in a way that is optimized for the manner in which BD discs are read.
Simple.
Oh...you might want to throw a line break into your comments too.
They lowered the camera fidelty and pushed some processing to the Xbox to save money. Not saying its bad...just stop lying in public Kudo.
This should have been thrown in as a long form tech demo.
.
Nintendo will not give the user experience to Onlive...ever.
Sony 'may' go the Onlive route...but on their own hardware.
MS would only go Onlive if they can merge Live into it...they are the most likely to go this route as they are a software company first and foremost.
I can buy this for $60 and sell it in a month for at least $30...how is the PC game aftermarket?
And I could have said $199 (hell..this week $149 console) to play this game.
As for $100 gpu...you are talking greek to 99 percent of the populace.
Nintendo will, for instance, always want complete control of the user experience from top to bottom. Sony too has so much invested in developers that I think it behoves them the make their own hardware. MS already outsources the majority of their games and makes their money off live...I could see them just giving a baseline hardware model to hardware companies to get 'xbox certified' and leave the hardware business.
I swear PC players are like guys that show up to an orgy with a 10" rubber dildo strapped to their legs just to show how manly they are.
We get it...PC games offer better graphics. Now let me get back to my $299 console ffs.
I didn't say it wasn't more precise...I noted they are evalutions of existing tech. I guess I dont see a more precise gameplay as being new and unique (and bar raising) gameplay. Anyway...out of bubbles...sorry if anyone's panties are in a knot.
I thought I had responded if you were speaking of me.
I just don't see Kinect OR Move as 'raising the bar'...both are mere evolutions of existing tech and dont bring new or unique gameplay to the consumer. I know we are disagreeing as to what constitutes a 'raised' bar here but I think we can agree that both Kinect and Move are derivative technologies which do nothing to bring new gameplay to us.
Edit added as I'm out of bubbles...re...
someone has an opinion that differs from yours and automagically they are a troll.
I agree Move isn't 'raising the bar' either...does this make you feel better in some way?
raising the bar is introducing a new technology...not just incrementally improving on existing.
For instance the Wii did do that with they remote and the MOVE is an incremental improvement...again I would say they are not raising the bar either.
sounds like a PR release.
And by the way...removing the controller was done by the PS Eye...maybe not with the same fidelity but this isn't really a 'bar raising' technology imo.
/s